?

Log in

No account? Create an account
juin 2019   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
* - galaxy

a TRAGIC day

Posted on 2007.12.28 at 05:29
i am really saddened by the loss of Benazir Bhutto.  It was a stupid stupid and disgusting tragedy.  She was my main girl and also pretty damn hot for a world leader.

Seriously, I want you people to know that this was most clearly an action by Musharraf.  But more than this, it was a direct result of the failure of the Bush administration - I don't want to sound like a crazy radical liberal - but it's the truth - and that's where i go.

First of all - she was poised to win the upcoming election - so it's obvious right there.  Second - if you watched Musharraf's decision-making process, you will know that it ultimately conformed to dialogue with the Bush administration.  Bush asked that she be released, and she was.  But if you know anything about evil human nature, you would have thought, "Wait - that's just too good to be true...  Musharraf imposed marshal law to silence this force, and then he releases her but still allows elections?!  Something's not right here."  Plus the assassin was a sharp-shooter - who blew himself up.

Do we need to be reminded of how Musharraf  tacitly allowed Al Qaeda to sneak into his country until Bush spoke up about it?  HE'S the fricken terrorist!

Bush has been supporting Musharraf like we supported the Shaw of Iran, as a hamper against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.  But he was so soooo ignorant of the importance of Pakistan.  His main philosophy was, "Well, if we let the Bhutto EXTREMIST TERRORISTS gain control, then they will be in control of the NUKES and that is CHANGE!  Let's be safe and hold on to our dictator!"  I'm sorry, but Bhutto was not an Islamic extremist, she was pro-democracy!  You can keep branding the people as selfish, unruly and unpredictable - but unless you give them the rights and power they deserve, you will never control them.  Give them rights and eventually they will control themselves!!  The whole policy was retarded.

I don't have any idea if Bush wanted her removed from prominence - I mean - I think he did - but i don't know if he implied any action to that effect.  BUT - here's how I'm personally sure the suggestion went:  "Look, Mushy, it's just too third-world - too obvious - for you to lock her up and hold elections...  So what you need to do is set her free...  And what you do with her after that...  I have no comment..."

Bhutto was one of those rare Democratic leaders who actually portended spirited, positive revolutionary change.  She WAS a martyr!  It always boggles my mind that dictatorial leaders keep underestimating the influence of such leaders and such movements.  They are so wrapped up in paranoia and control, and their own historical egos, that they are incapable of fathoming true human nature.  Human dynamics.  POLITICS!  What stupid idiot would assassinate a MARTYR and thing he could gain from it?!  A retard!

Bhutto was a divinated leader - even though she came from a position of wealth.  Once you see you have influence, and you see all your relatives being assassinated, SOME people come to the conclusion that they might as well do GOOD, because life is silly and fleeting.  It is BIGGER THAN EGO.

The whole stupid thing about her being corrupt was hogwash - politically motivated.  And what a stupid-ass charge anyway.  Why would she want to be corrupt, when she abandoned a life of privilege?  Corruption is something lower-middle-class people do - and Pakistan doesn't have much of a middle class, so SO WHAT?  Who cares?  Just a fistful of fucking fundamentalist assholes.  And even if it WERE true - what the hell does corruption count, weighed against tyranny and killings in a chaotic country?!  Yo - personally - if i was seeking GOOD power in such a country, i wouldn't bat an eye at corruption - Mayor Daley did it and sometimes it works.  When you're fighting religious fundamentalists, the LEAST you could resort to is a little corruption fgs!

I'm pissed about this because here was a really useful POTENTIAL FOR POSITIVE GROWTH cut down for no reason but stupidity.

I am familiar with those games, and i know that they can culminate in death.  And i completely ABHOR it all!

There was a reason Bhutto once visited  Rockford College, btw.  It was "founded" by one of the most influencial peace advocates in world history, Jane Addams, who inspired countless world leaders.

Goodbye to Benazir Bhutto.  I wish she had chosen a successor.  But even in two weeks, there is still time...

Comments:


Joo
jewelsl85 at 2007-12-28 22:49 (UTC) (Lien)
While I didn't know much about her, I was still very saddened to hear this news.
where hypotheses come to die
madman101 at 2007-12-29 21:40 (UTC) (Lien)
yeah - she was a great person - it is sad
the green bastard...
seymour_glass at 2007-12-29 09:10 (UTC) (Lien)
there is a lot more to this than meets the eye...it's always convenient to automatically blame terrorists because no one questions that...but i think it involved the pakistani army myself...
where hypotheses come to die
madman101 at 2007-12-29 21:47 (UTC) (Lien)
i agree

people see violence and think terrorism - they have forgotten a lot of the human condition and struggle

i am quite sure it was mushy and the army - it was so strange how Mushy came out trying to claim an assassin didn't kill her, the bomb did - when it DIDN'T... in a country like that, doctors will say what they're told to say.
Dot
dottie_luv at 2007-12-29 17:00 (UTC) (Lien)
i think what i find even more annoying is the fact that the american media is HARDLY covering the story! They just keep going on and on about that tiger that went loose! And although sure, that is a crazy story- the news isnt there to try and capture your attention as if you were 5 years old ("ooh, look! Tiger!") Its there to INFORM you-- and there are still a lot of unanswered questions that come to mind when I think of this entire case. Thats why I watch the BBC World News :)
where hypotheses come to die
madman101 at 2007-12-29 21:53 (UTC) (Lien)
BBC! - it has ALWAYS been the best news service in the world! it's on radio all night on WNIJ of course, and I spent many hours listening to it on shortwave. and watched it too. i love you for that.

well - i agree - our media isn't covering the deeper points of it. but they are glomming on to the whole dead celebrity thing.

i was thinking the same thing the other day - about the news not informing... i like to have the morning news on on TV - but there's so much shlop - it isn't news anymore! and the local channels stay on the same main stories for two or three days, saying the same things.

although, i must confess, i eat up all the cooking advice ha ha
Previous Entry  Next Entry