"a killing field for hypotheses" (madman101) wrote,
"a killing field for hypotheses"
madman101

Massive Human Head In Chinese Well Forces Scientists To Rethink Evolution


Maybe they finally found Dong Jingwei.

New "Dragon Man" human species may be our closest relative

Click pic for article...

The eyeballs should be bigger

'Dragon man' fossil may replace Neanderthals as our closest relative

Click pic for article...

They need to test for shovel-teeth

Click pic for Wikipedia...

A derivative Erectus


Comment: This is another strike against the ONLY-Out-of-Africa theory. This guy is another derivative of Homo Erectus, (related to Dali Man, and partly to Denisovans). Homo Erectus and these derivations continued to exist across Asia while Neandertals were evolving from Homo Heidelbergensis, in Europe, who evolved from Erectus. Heidelbergensis is said to also be the ancestor of Homo Sapiens, wich spread throughout Africa, Europe and Asia. However, the three Asian derivatives mentioned above, (including Dragon Man), certainly also contributed to the evolution and preponderance of Sapiens. Neandertals, twice removed from Erectus, further intermixed with northern Sapiens, some of whom later went INTO Africa and distributed some genetic influences there, especially in Northern Africa.

So, the whole, linear, Out-of-Africa theory is seriously out of touch. It is based on two assumptions: The fortuitous very old finds in the Great Rift Valley meant that the very old hominids initially emerged ONLY in Africa; and, Since modern Homo Sapiens clearly migrated out of Africa from about 30,000-120,000+ years ago, then ALL modern humans must have migrated out of Africa. That's just wrong. There was a very strong presence of Erectus in Asia for millions of years extending, in fact, up until about 14,000 years ago in SE Asia. From that population, Eastern humans arose, while in the West, Western humans arose, and so on. But,. more than this, there was constant interaction between these derivatives. So, human evolution is not even a tree, with branches merging later on. It's a multifactoral, open field, with all sorts of changes going on. FROM Wiki, on Dali -

Some anthropologists, notably many Chinese representatives, cite the characteristics of the Dali cranium and other similar Chinese fossils of that era as evidence for genetic continuity in modern H. sapiens today, arguing that Dali's traits are commonly found in modern Chinese H. sapiens populations. In turn, it was argued that modern Chinese humans did not evolve in Africa, but instead evolved in China from a separate lineage of H. erectus.[12] This position would be consistent with the "Multiregional hypothesis," which states that different human populations across the planet had evolved with current racial characteristics in separate environments, and is contrary to the popular "Recent single-origin hypothesis," which asserts that modern H. sapiens evolved solely in Africa and spread throughout the planet during a recent exodus. But it has also been suggested that Dali man, if determined to belong to Homo sapiens, may represent an earlier expansion of archaic H. sapiens out of Africa predating the later more successful expansion ancestral to modern non-African populations.[13]
Reposted from madman101 at DreamWidth.
Subscribe

  • The Chinese Pear That Ate America

    Scientists thought they had created the perfect tree. But it became a nightmare. ...But like a comic book supervillain who had started off…

  • tree-trimmers are falling from the sky

    “I heard this boom this evening, and evidently so did a lot of other people. It was short and loud and very immediate, by which I mean I thought…

  • Blame is the new dollar

    (written thursday, july 28): "Heads, I win. Tails, you lose." That's the ultimate rationalisation of the proto-fascist. When individuals lose their…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments