?

Log in

No account? Create an account
août 2017   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
galaxy

Bobble Heads and Fuzzy Dice

Posted on 2016.07.10 at 18:30
Tags: , , ,
Well. I don't know if I'll ever get around to it, but it was apparent to me how vastly choreographed was the presentation of Hillary Clinton's testimony, as well as the press and the arrangement of campaign activities, including Obama, both before and after the hearing. It was also obvious to me, especially from the stances taken against Trump across the media, etc., that Hillary WOULD NOT be indicted. Why? Because, indeed, dark money, Bush money, GOP money, and big coporate liberal money is betting on her. Unless some accident occurs, Hillary is a SHOE-IN. Aside from Monsanto, Goldman-Sachs. etc., Hillary's biggest supporter has been GEORGE SOROS. Don't dismiss his being possibly the most destructively influential person in the country, simply because far-righties keep harping on him. Don't dismiss this simply because he makes lots of money, and is on the "side" of the Democrats. George Soros is head-deep in blood, here and in Europe. He is behind so much of what is happening today, you would be astonished, if you dared to consider what I hope to tell you, in some upcoming post. I'll keep you posted.

Presently, let's just take a look at the additional lies produced by Hillary Clinton. Recall the other lies in the past, which you can find in a few of my political posts, listed at, liberal_plus. Or, I am sure there must be a website somewhere which lists ALL the lies she has told to date. She believes her own lies, as a controllaholic who loves to hear the sound of her own voice. Remember, about half of all psychopaths are female. What would be the chance that a psychopath might cheat her way to the top, by hook or by crook, in a country full of corporate money, greed, lies, revenge and DYSFUNCTION? The chances are VERY STRONG. SO, WHY SHOULD IT BE TABOO TO IMAGINE THAT HILLARY CLINTON MAY INDEED JUST SUCH A PERSON? Goldman Sachs destroyed Greece. Monsanto is murdering the health of the world. Soros is funding the destabilisation of many societies, INCLUDING OUR OWN, in the interest of his own pocketbook, and of building up mega-regional governments, as functionaries of global mega-corporations. All of it is deemed too big to fail, which is a kind of religion of the corrupted.

(NOTE: The title below is somewhat incorrect. It may suggest that her lies were refuted AS BEING LIES, i.e., proved true. Instead, the title should read: "Hillary's Seven Biggest ASSERTIONS Proved False...")

Hillary's Seven Biggest Lies Refuted By The FBI, And The 'Smoking Gun'
When FBI director James Comey stunned America last week by exonerating Hillary Clinton for being "grossly negligent" in her abuse of professional duties, but not criminal, he opened up a whole new can of worms for the presidential candidate, namely that she had repeatedly perjured herself and lied to both Congress and the American people.


"I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email”

“It was allowed, but it was not a good choice”

“I provided the department with all of my work-related emails, all that I had”

“I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two”

“The FBI has the server that was used during the tenure of my State Department service”

“There were no security breaches”

“There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received.”


Note that V.Putin has copies of those emails, including the tens of thousands that HILLARY DELETED, (given sufficient time to do so by the FBI and Justic Departments). So, be sure, this buddy of Donald Trump may release them, if WikiLeaks, etc., does not. [For the full article, go to link above].

"The FBI did not ask us for copies of our upcoming Hillary Clinton leaks before concluding its investigation. Credible detective work! Not. — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 8, 2016

This is Why the Clinton Emailgate Scandal so HUGE: "Emailgate, Servergate, Benghazigate, Syriagate, Libyagate, ISISgate and Clinton Foundationgate all intersect to expose a massive and unparalleled conspiracy of criminality and corruption in the U.S. Federal Government."

America Has Become A Lawless Nation – Hillary Clinton Magically Cleared By The FBI

Hillary Clinton and the Cop Who Killed Philando Castile Have One Thing in Common

Trump and Hillary Refuse to Explain Why They Both Share the Same Address in Delaware

The Leaked List Of Hillary Clinton’s Mega Donors

Why Do SO Many People Dislike Hillary? (BBC audio)

Bad News for Hillary: Huge Percentage of Bernie Supporters Won’t Vote for Her

Hillary’s Lies And The Benghazi Attack

3 Boggling Facts In Hillary Email Cover-Up/Dallas Shooting

HILLARY CLINTON LIES ABOUT BEING LIED ABOUT ON FOSSIL FUEL CONNECTIONS

I do not support Hillary Clinton for president. If it was just Hillary versus Trump, I would rather see Trump as president, for some policy reasons. However, I would never support or vote for Trump. What to do? The answer is very easy. The answer is always easy: "VOTE FOR THE PERSON YOU BELIEVE IN!" Don't remain in their trap, playing the game of armchair talking head, voting for the person whom you think CAN win - e.e., voting for one evil in order that the worse evil does not win. In the mirror, the opposite party is doing the same thing, seeing YOUR choice as the worse evil. These comparisons are mainly based not on policy or wisdom, but on childish media circus politics. The horserace. Look at how even NPR has been playing HORSERACE all through this campaign, only to conveniently fall into line behind either Clinton or Trump, (although the latter is now hexed by big money now). Then, the election comes down to a narrow 50% versus 50% margin, which is completely manipulatable by the corporatist powers that be, through computer tampering with electronic voting machines.

So: What I say is this: I will support whom I believe in, and though this may end up with Trump being elected, then that's fine - I'll maintain the motivation to continue the fight. Progressives can vote for Bernie Sanders AS A WRITE-IN! Or, they can vote for the GREEN candidate - or whomever. If progressive CONSERVATIVES did the same thing, e.g., voting for the Libertarian or Constitutionalist candidates, then this double assault will work to dimmish BOTH status quo, establishment parties. That is to say, the fear of the OTHER (party) winning out is what keeps everyone stuck in the continuing status quo, controlled by the corporate elites, and globalised investment/central banks. And, if people would stop hewing to the lies, and voted for the candidates they simply believed in, then there would be cross-over between the two stagnant parties. Thus, the way to save the SOUL of the Democratic party, (or the Republican party), is not to vote for its nominee in blind desperation, but to vote for whomever one believes in. Anyone! Write the person in, if you have to! And, in the mean time, work on other things like amending the Constitution. And, in the mean time, if Trump ends up elected, then maybe we'll see some serious follow-up prosecution of Hillary Clinton - yes by the GOP.

NPR is currently running a repeat of, "On The Media"'s show about political LIES. When that show first aired, it hurt Bernie Sanders. It lumped him in with all other lying politicians, and said that he was lying when he claimed that, "We spend twice as much on health care than do European countries!" In fact, this is TRUE. Nevertheless, not only has, "On The Media", retracted IT's lie, but has gone on to repeat the show. Well, repeating this show now hurts Donald Trump most. The first time around, it fueled the fire fanned up over Trump's supposed incessant lying. And now, it socks it to him all over again - soon after Hilary Clinton so blatantly lied vis-a-vis the Benghazi investigation, with Trump calling her out on it. One part of the show did put forth that politicians lie because many Americans do not want to hear the truth, especially if it disagrees with the stories they want to believe. The is true. And, I think its one reason why Donald Trump shoots his mouth off so casually, producing what sometimes seem to be lies, because he wants to say the (false) "truth" that his crowd wants to hear. But, also, he believes his lies, such as, "Thousands of Celebrating Moslems"...

I myself do recall media reports of Moslems in this country celebrating immediately after 9/11. These installed more fear, like, "Omg, what is happening, it is like everything is falling apart!" At the same time, there was actually footage of THOUSANDS of Moslems celebrating in the Middle East. A little latter, hidden away, those USA celebrations were debunked in the media - in some media. It didn't make headline news, because people wanted to believe it. There probably WERE some small groups of Moslems celebrating in the USA, but I suspect that the main story was just more propaganda planted by the Bush Administration, (like, "We know that Iraq has WMD's!"). OK - so it's like this:

THE MANDELA EFFECT: Many people still believe that they saw, on TV, thousands of Moslems celebrating in the USA - because they dutifully conflated the false USA story with the true Middle East story. Do you remember this time? It was a time of psychic trauma. Fear leaning to convert into anger. Just like a cornered animal, it will grab any lie as a weapon of truth. Do you remember how THE ENTIRE MEDIA, and the House and the Senate, and the Churches, ALL GOT ON BOARD TO GO TO WAR WITH IRAQ FOR GEORGE BUSH? So, I do think that if we are going to call Trump's false memory's actual conniving lies, then we should consider if we all might not be thrown in jail for being war criminals.

What was I doing at the time? Writing Letters to the Editor. I started my own newspaper column. Fighting back the lies. I got a lot of blowback for the latter, by a bunch of militarised zombies, calling me crazy. Turns out that Britain has concluded that Tony Blair's IRAQ WAR WAS ILLEGAL. Simple enough. But it takes people decades to learn. And many of the callous assertions made today, by fumbling old baby boomers, are part of the learning process. So. Here is that, "On The Media," show, if you'd like - 7/10/16 - http://www.wpr.org/programs/archives/on-the-media - or - https://www.wnyc.org/shows/otm/ - There is a good bit w/ Michael Linden, (New America Foundation), at the end.

Previous Entry  Next Entry